Application Details:
| Version: | 2006 (3DMark06) |
| License: | Retail |
| URL: | https://benchmarks.ul.com/3dma... |
| Votes: | 0 |
| Latest Rating: | Gold |
| Latest Wine Version Tested: | 6.0 |
Maintainers: About Maintainership
What works
Almost everything works.
However, also WINE 6.0 requires that the original 'd3dx9_28.dll' file is installed (winetricks -q d3dx9_28). Otherwise the HDR/SM3.0 graphics tests will crash right before they are performed.
What does not
HDR/SM3.0 graphics tests will crash right before they are performed if the WINE built-in d3dx9_28.dll file is used.
Workarounds
The original 'd3dx9_28.dll' file has to be installed. (winetricks -q d3dx9_28). In my case also the 'd3dcompiler_47.dll' seems to be needed (winetricks -q d3dcompiler_47).
What was not tested
Everything was tested.
Hardware tested
Graphics:
Additional Comments
On systems with opensource Gallium drivers and no Vulkan support: Gallium Nine will bring even more additional performance which is absolutely comparable to DX9VK.
| Operating system | Test date | Wine version | Installs? | Runs? | Used Workaround? | Rating | Submitter | ||
| Current | Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" (+ variants like Kubuntu) | Feb 28 2021 | 6.0 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Gold | C. Leu | |
| Show | Debian GNU/Linux 8.x "Jessie" x86_64 | Jul 04 2015 | 1.7.46 | Yes | Yes | Gold | Wylda | ||
| Show | Ubuntu 14.04 "Trusty" i386 (+ variants like Kubuntu) | May 02 2014 | 1.7.17 | Yes | Yes | Gold | Jarkko Korpi | ||
| Show | CentOS 6.4 | Sep 16 2013 | 1.7.1 | Yes | Yes | Gold | Artem S. Tashkinov | ||
| Show | Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring" amd64 (+ variants like Kubuntu) | Aug 07 2013 | 1.6 | Yes | Yes | Bronze | an anonymous user |
In order to run 3DMark 2006 under Wine you have to:
1) first install d3dx9_28.dll and d3dx9_36.dll dlls using winetricks (right mouse click, "Save link as", save as winetricks.sh, then make it executable, then run it).
2) edit the 3dmark 2006 link and add this flag to its command line: "-nosysteminfo", so it will look like:
wine "C:\\Program Files\\\Futuremark\\3DMark06\\3DMark06.exe" -nosysteminfo
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. WineHQ is not responsible for what they say.
by Artem S. Tashkinov on Monday September 16th 2013, 16:25
16430 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 5384
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 7855
CPU Score: 6313
(native d3dx9_36 and d3dx_28 are required, 3DMark must be run with -nosysteminfo option)
Windows 7 64 results will be posted shortly.
by Artem S. Tashkinov on Friday September 20th 2013, 2:36
24950 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 9874
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 12681
CPU Score: 6042
CPU score is more or less the same, SM scores are almost two times smaller.
by Artem S. Tashkinov on Saturday March 17th 2012, 6:51
10101 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 4506
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 3007
CPU Score: 7006
Windows XP 64/NVIDIA 285.58
15568 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 6196
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 5918
CPU Score: 7407
CPU: Intel Core i5 2500K @4.1GHz
GPU: NVIDIA 9800GT non-overclocked
Wine definitely needs to be greatly improved, on average it's 33% slower, but in SM3.0 test it's two times slower.
by Vadim on Sunday December 12th 2010, 11:32
2xGTX280, QX9770, resolution 1600x1200, all other settings default.
SLI=Auto
7418 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 2362
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 3167
CPU Score: 5185
(SLI=AFR gives the same scores, SFR slightly better, AA even more better (despite there was no antialiasing at all))
SLI=Off
8341 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score: 2805
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 3471
CPU Score: 5199
i.e. single card has better performance. Weird...
by Vadim on Sunday January 9th 2011, 7:22
Why such strange results?