AppDB entry for Miranda 0.9.x series.
Application Details:
Version: | 0.9.x |
License: | Open Source |
URL: | https://web.archive.org/web/20... |
Votes: | 0 |
Latest Rating: | Silver |
Latest Wine Version Tested: | 1.3.21 |
Maintainers: About Maintainership
What works
Basic functionality.
What does not
Paste from clipboard to a chat window.
SSL connections to ICQ servers (probably it affects other protocols too - I'm only using ICQ).
Modern contact list interface/plugin.
Workarounds
What was not tested
Most protocols beyond ICQ, most plugins beyond officially supplied ones.
Hardware tested
Graphics:
Additional Comments
Operating system | Test date | Wine version | Installs? | Runs? | Used Workaround? | Rating | Submitter | ||
Show | Arch Linux | Jun 01 2011 | 1.3.21 | Yes | Yes | No | Silver | nis | |
Current | Fedora 13 | Oct 20 2010 | 1.3.5 | Yes | Yes | No | Gold | Artem S. Tashkinov | |
Show | Fedora 12 | Mar 06 2010 | 1.1.40 | Yes | Yes | No | Gold | Artem S. Tashkinov |
Bug # | Description | Status | Resolution | Other apps affected |
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. WineHQ is not responsible for what they say.
by Andrew Selivanov on Tuesday November 23rd 2010, 8:53
by Stefan Kraus on Saturday October 30th 2010, 9:28
forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?4624-Miranda-on-Linux&p=200702#post200702
Short story:
SSL is often cumbersome to get through wine.
So don't rely on the SSL capabilities of wine:
Instead use a Miranda plugin which provides SSL functionality.
grantd compiled one based on the PolarSSL library (polarssl.org/). You can Download it from the Miranda forums. (See his posting I linked at the beginning of this comment!)
Long story (How someone helped him get the job done):
Read through this thread: forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?24132-Miranda-IM-Linux-Yahoo-Error
They actually talk about Yahoo, but an SSL issue is an SSL issue whether it is used by Yahoo or ICQ or anything else.
by Artem S. Tashkinov on Saturday October 30th 2010, 14:39
However I (personally) won't use this DLL, because I don't trust it. If it can be compiled under wine, then it'll be more attractive solution. Or if someone digitally signs it.
by GrantD on Thursday January 20th 2011, 19:13